The Netflix series “A Man in Full” is a modern retelling of Tom Wolfe’s 1998 novel of the same name. Created by David E. Kelley, the show is a loose adaptation of the novel, with significant departures from the original material. The series explores realistic corporate greed without the traditional “eat the rich” attitude, instead focusing on the complexities of wealth and power struggles.
Charlie Croker, the wealthy real estate agent, is a multi-dimensional character, embodying the traits and morals required to create an Atlanta mogul. His backstory is reminiscent of certain Atlanta businessmen, including Taz Anderson and Charles Loudermilk, who also played football at Georgia Tech and injured their knees. However, Croker’s character is not without flaws, as he is brutally honest, using explicit language, and has an attachment to a symbolic trophy.
A Still From A Man in Full (Via IMDB)
The show does not shy away from tackling real issues, such as police brutality and the MeToo movement. Conrad’s storyline, which alludes to real police brutality issues, is one of the most striking plotlines. Joyce’s underdeveloped subplot touches on the concerns of men and women who have been sexually assaulted being able to own their experiences. However, this aspect of realism was cut short and did not receive the same level of focus as Conrad’s storyline.
The show’s ending deviates significantly from the original novel, with a loud and boisterous conclusion. The Netflix series’ ending sees both Croker and Peepgrass die in a power struggle, whereas Wolfe’s novel ends with both characters living happy lives. Despite this departure from the source material, the show’s realistic portrayal of corporate greed and powerful characters is undoubtedly impactful.
“A Man in Full” offers a realistic look at corporate greed, exploring the complexities of wealth and power struggles. With its strong cast, including Jeff Daniels and Lucy Liu, the show is a must-watch for those interested in exploring the intricacies of wealth and power.
